From the filing
PDF page 123
Printed filing page 112 · Extracted page text
Read the page text
Table of Contents for this type of balancing litigation, which may create uncertainty around the scope of our directors’ obligations or the remedies available to stockholders. Additionally, any such litigation may be costly, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our amended and restated bylaws will designate a state or federal court located within the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, and also provide that the federal district courts will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, each of which may limit our stockholders’ ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, stockholders, or employees. Our amended and restated bylaws, which will become effective immediately prior to the completion of this offering, will provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, another State court in Delaware or the federal district court for the District of Delaware) will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our current or former directors, stockholders, or officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, (iv) any action arising pursuant to or to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or our amended and restated bylaws, or (v) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, except for, in all cases, any claim as to which such court determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to the jurisdiction of such court (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of such court within 10 days following such determination). Section 22 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), establishes concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over Securities Act claims. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to hear such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our amended and restated bylaws will also provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States will, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, be the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause or causes of action arising under the Securities Act against any person in connection with any offering of our securities, including, without limitation, any auditor, underwriter, expert, control person, or other defendant. Unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware will, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any derivative action or proceeding brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules or regulations thereunder. All other claims arising under the Exchange Act may be brought in any federal court of competent jurisdiction. Any person or entity purchasing, holding, or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing bylaw provisions. Although we believe these exclusive forum provisions benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law and federal securities laws in the types of lawsuits to which each applies, the exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or our current or former directors, officers, stockholders, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims against us and our current and former directors, officers, stockholders, or other employees. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder as a result of our exclusive forum provisions. 112
Text is provided for reference. Check the original for tables, images, and exact formatting.