The paper trail

Small print.
Wide open.

A clear path from a claim to the page it came from. Here’s the filing, the research, and how we read it.

The documentS–1Anthropic, PBC26 OCT 2026 · 421 PP.
01The original SEC filingThe authoritative source, in your browser.SEC · HTML 02Download the saved filingThe complete 421-page document, optimized for downloading.PDF · 46 MB 03Download the full researchFindings, customer examples, calculations, and source references.Markdown

Page by page

Go straight to the source.

Page references count physical pages in the saved PDF, starting at 1. The printed filing number is shown separately when available.

Enter a page from 1 to 421. No PDF download needed.

From the filing

PDF page 195

Printed filing page 184 · Extracted page text

View on the SEC
Read the page text
Table of Contents

agents in their daily work, enabling a comparatively small team to take on work that would traditionally require 
a far larger one by multiplying the impact of each person. 

The  expansion  of  our  own  use  of  Claude  reflects  this  leverage  directly. The  value  of  our  own  internal  Claude 
usage at list prices has grown by over 250 times from January 2026 to September 2026, and in April 2026, this 
monthly  value  first  exceeded  our  monthly  personnel  expense,  excluding  stock-based  compensation. Because 
each  version  of  Claude  is  used  to  help  build  the  next  and  because  Claude  makes  our  teams  more  productive 
across the company, we believe the compute we devote to internal usage compounds these gains, continuously 
accelerating our pace of development and further strengthening our leadership position.

Using  AI  to  help  build  more  capable  AI  could  also  pose  a  considerable  safety  risk,  particularly  if  it  sharply 
accelerates the pace of progress. This is one of the areas covered by our Responsible Scaling Policy, which sets 
out  our  plans  to  monitor  and  mitigate  the  risks  as  we  approach  what  has  been  termed  “recursive  self-
improvement.”

AI is Transforming Intelligence 

We believe that Powerful AI, a highly capable and impactful form of frontier AI characterized by the following 
key attributes, will become widely available within a few years:

•

•

•

•

•

cognitive capabilities matching or exceeding those of top human experts across most professional and 
scientific disciplines;

the ability to navigate all interfaces available to a human working virtually, including text, audio, video, 
and direct computer control;

the ability to reason through complex tasks autonomously over extended periods—lasting hours, days, 
or weeks—and seek clarification and feedback when needed; 

the  ability  to  coordinate  across  multiple  instances  and  collaborate  with  both  humans  and  other  AI 
systems; and

the  ability  to  interface  with  the  physical  world  by  digitally  controlling  laboratory  equipment,  robotic 
systems, and other machines through digital connections.

If Powerful AI is directed at solving humanity’s hardest problems and the risks are managed responsibly, the 
potential  is  extraordinary.  The  possibilities  include  compressing  decades  of  scientific  progress  into  years; 
accelerating drug discovery, disease detection, and the delivery of personalized therapy; providing individually 
tailored education and expert financial and legal advice; advancing power grids and battery design for greater 
efficiency  and  reliability;  and  extending  to  the  developing  world  capabilities  that  took  wealthy  nations 
generations to build.

Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Progress

The intelligence and capabilities of AI systems have advanced dramatically. Tasks that were beyond the reach of 
AI systems just a few years ago, such as complex mathematical reasoning, designing scientific experiments, and 
executing substantial portions of software development, are now routinely performed by AI. 

These  advances  have  followed  empirical  “Scaling  Laws,”  the  finding  that  AI  model  performance  improves 
predictably with increases in model size, training data, and compute. The foundational paper, Scaling Laws for 
Neural Language Models, whose lead authors (including Dario Amodei, Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, and 
Tom Brown) later co-founded Anthropic, was critical in establishing these relationships and helped guide the 
wave of modern LLMs. 

We  expect  AI  capabilities—across  language,  reasoning,  mathematics,  coding,  scientific  analysis,  and  an 
expanding range of agentic tasks and knowledge work—to continue advancing for many years. As a result, we 
believe this will drive demand for AI that outstrips supply for the foreseeable future, limited principally by the 
availability  of  compute.  We  believe  that  the  majority  of  this  demand  will  be  concentrated  at  the  frontier:  our 
experience has been that enterprises gravitate to our most capable models across a wide variety of workloads, 

184

Text is provided for reference. Check the original for tables, images, and exact formatting.

Find a section 16 starting points

Section links may begin before the exact paragraph cited in a finding. PDF numbers below use physical pages.

  1. Founders’ letterp. 3SEC
  2. Defined termsp. 12SEC
  3. Prospectus summaryp. 16SEC
  4. Risk factorsp. 38SEC
  5. Management’s discussion & analysisp. 144SEC
  6. Businessp. 190SEC
  7. Governancep. 254SEC
  8. Executive compensationp. 275SEC
  9. Related-person transactionsp. 293SEC
  10. Principal & selling stockholdersp. 299SEC
  11. Capital-stock rightsp. 303SEC
  12. Shares eligible for future salep. 318SEC
  13. Underwritingp. 327SEC
  14. Auditor change & expertsp. 345SEC
  15. Financial statements & notesp. 347SEC
  16. Part II & exhibit indexp. 413SEC

How this was made

Read in full.
Kept in context.

A snapshot of the filing dated , rather than a live record of later events.

3primary reviewers
421pages reviewed
43image instances checked

The review

Three primary reviewers read non-overlapping ranges of the complete main filing. All 43 embedded image instances were transcribed and visually reviewed, including the founders’ letter, charts, and customer case studies. Financial tables were also checked visually for dates, units, and column alignment.

A separate reviewer checked the draft’s calculations, accounting interpretations, and customer qualifications. An additional check covered the later merged findings. The result is 62 findings and 21 customer examples.

The boundary

Companion contracts and other exhibits named in the filing’s index are separate documents and were not independently reviewed. Customer outcomes, technical benchmarks, forecasts, and scientific priority claims remain attributed company or customer disclosures.

The numbers

Dollar figures are U.S. dollars. H1 means the six months ended June 30; Q2 means the three months ended June 30. The 2026 interim financial statements are unaudited. Our calculations show their inputs and are labeled separately from reported values.

Blank fields stay undisclosed. Figures with different periods, conditions, or potentially overlapping scopes are kept separate. An earlier tender price is not an IPO price.

What the evidence labels mean
Reported in filing
A company disclosure, with the period and accounting basis retained.
Company estimate / company claim
An estimate or assertion attributed to the company, with its uncertainty preserved.
Our calculation
A derived figure using cited inputs. It is not a separately reported company metric.
Customer example
A selected case study, with its measurement limits. It is not representative ROI.
Proposed / conditional
A status qualifier for an arrangement that is not yet effective or depends on stated conditions.

About updates. This edition is tied to the October 26, 2026 filing. Any later revision should identify its new source date and preserve the basis of earlier claims.

The footnotes are only the beginning.Explore the findings Read the story
The original, in context

Open the footnote.

A closer look at the filing

Anthropic · Form S-1PDF 1

Opening page 1…

Filed October 26, 2026. PDF is approximately 46 MB and opens only when requested. Section links may precede the exact cited paragraph.