From the filing
PDF page 151
Printed filing page 140 · Extracted page text
Read the page text
Table of Contents Cloud Partnerships. Claude is accessible on all three major cloud platforms, AWS, GCP, and Azure, allowing enterprises to deploy Claude within the infrastructure, security perimeters, and commitment structures they already operate. These CSPs extend our reach through their large combined field teams that are empowered to sell our platform and applications, accelerating market adoption at a scale we believe would be difficult for any single organization to directly replicate. We have a joint go-to-market approach with these CSPs through which we establish direct contractual relationships with our customers while paying a fee to each CSP. This structure allows us to foster stronger commercial alignment with these CSPs, avoid channel conflict, set pricing, and realize the financial benefits of ongoing compute efficiency improvements. Ecosystem Partnerships. Major global SIs have built dedicated Claude practices with teams trained to deploy our platform and applications. Go-to-market alliances with leading data platforms embed Claude into data infrastructure that enterprises already operate, facilitating adoption of Claude within existing workflows and making it easier for enterprises to realize value from Claude. Ode with Anthropic. We recently launched an AI services company in partnership with leading private equity firms to bring Claude’s capabilities to mid-sized companies across sectors, building solutions on the Claude Platform and supporting customers over the long term. Ode with Anthropic will partner closely with our Applied AI and go-to-market teams. Together, these approaches have led to a structurally efficient approach to facilitating the diffusion of Claude in the economy, with our sales, marketing, and partnerships expenses representing 19% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026. Key Factors Affecting Our Performance Remaining at the Frontier of AI We believe enterprises consistently choose the most capable and trustworthy AI systems, making our position at the frontier an important driver of our success. Our ability to rapidly grow our revenue is partially dependent on our continued delivery of more intelligent and capable models. Our experience is that as we deliver models with meaningfully improved capabilities that deliver higher intelligence per dollar spent, customers find new applications for AI across their businesses, accelerating adoption and revenue growth. This can be seen in the trajectory of our model family adoption. Successive versions of our most intelligent generally available model have delivered meaningfully greater intelligence and capabilities. With each release, we have seen most customers utilize the latest version of our models, reinforcing the direct relationship between frontier model quality and revenue generation. As we deliver more capable models, customers have expanded their usage into new use cases and increased their spending accordingly. We expect our ability to deliver innovation in intelligence and capability at the frontier to remain a key driver of revenue growth in future periods, and maintaining a leading position requires continued investment in research and compute, top technical talent, and access to capital sufficient to support our growth trajectory. Securing Sufficient Compute and Optimizing its Utilization Our ability to continue advancing intelligence at the frontier depends on securing sufficient compute for research, model development, serving customers, and internal usage of Claude. Our ability to leverage heterogeneous compute helps us to secure compute at sufficient scale and optimal price-performance. If any of our chip partners are unable to deliver committed compute or experience delays, or if we need to procure incremental compute, we benefit from having a range of partners as opposed to being overly reliant on any one partner. The availability, timing, and cost of compute are subject to factors largely outside our control, including the concentration of chip and memory manufacturing among a limited number of suppliers and geographies, constraints on the availability of power and data center capacity, and evolving export controls. We have historically operated in a compute-constrained environment in which demand for compute has exceeded the supply available to us. In addition, certain of the CSPs on which we rely for compute are also strategic investors in us, are our customers, and offer AI models and services that compete with ours. These multifaceted relationships could give rise to conflicts of interest or competitive dynamics that adversely affect our access to compute, its cost, or the prioritization of our workloads. 140
Text is provided for reference. Check the original for tables, images, and exact formatting.