From the filing
PDF page 85
Printed filing page 74 · Extracted page text
Read the page text
Table of Contents Our relationships with our strategic partners—whether with these CSPs, who simultaneously serve as our investors, customers, distribution partners, and competitors, or with Broadcom, which simultaneously serves as a supplier and lessor—create potential conflicts of interest that are difficult to fully anticipate or mitigate. These CSPs may prioritize their own compute needs or those of their other customers, including competitors in which they have invested, may gain insight into our operations and compute requirements through their roles as providers that could inform their competitive strategies, or may make business decisions regarding their platforms that disadvantage our models, platform, and applications relative to their own offerings or the offerings of other companies they support. Similarly, Broadcom may prioritize the supply of AI accelerators and infrastructure capacity to other customers, alter the terms of our equipment lease or the operation of our dedicated facilities, or make decisions regarding the availability or pricing of hardware that adversely affect our access to the compute infrastructure they provide. Any deterioration in these relationships, or any decision by Amazon, Google, Microsoft, or Broadcom to reduce their support for our models, platform, and applications or limit our access to compute, could adversely affect our business. In addition, such relationships, including any exclusive or preferential arrangements, investment ties, bundling of services, or cooperative initiatives, have attracted and may in the future attract antitrust or competition law scrutiny from regulators and private plaintiffs in the United States or other non-U.S. jurisdictions, and any resulting investigations, enforcement actions, or required modifications to our business arrangements could be costly, distracting, and harmful to our business. If we are unable to manage the foregoing risks, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. We are pursuing initiatives to develop our own data center infrastructure, which involves significant capital commitments, operational complexities, and execution risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. To help reduce our dependence on CSPs, address constraints on available compute, and secure access to compute at the scale necessary for frontier model development, we are pursuing initiatives to develop our own dedicated on-premise data center infrastructure. These efforts include long-term leases and partnerships with third-party partners to procure the underlying real estate, power, and data center facilities while we lease capacity in those facilities and contract with specialized third-party operators for ongoing facility management. We also procure certain compute and infrastructure equipment directly and operate them in dedicated data center facilities leased and operated on our behalf, to our specification. For example, under the 2026 Lease Arrangement, the rent payments over the five-year equipment lease are equal to an aggregate of approximately $125.2 billion excluding interest, with rent payable in quarterly installments and payment obligations typically commencing upon AI infrastructure equipment becoming “ready for service” at the applicable data center facility. The 2026 Lease Arrangement is non-cancelable by the parties to such agreement during the applicable lease period except in the case of a default. In addition, we deposited cash into a restricted account in April 2026 for the benefit of Broadcom to secure compute capacity, which amount may be released or applied toward obligations under the lease depending on the satisfaction of specified conditions. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to place additional cash into this restricted account for future amounts due under the 2026 Lease Arrangement. Upon the occurrence of certain uncured events of default, such as certain payment or performance failures pursuant to the terms of the 2026 Lease Arrangement, a substantial portion of our obligations under the 2026 Lease Arrangement would be accelerated and, while we have access to multiple sources of capital and are not dependent on the potential financing capacity provided in the Infrastructure Partner 2026 NPA that we entered into in connection with the 2026 Lease Arrangement, we may not be permitted to elect to issue the convertible promissory notes under the Infrastructure Partner 2026 NPA to finance such obligations. Furthermore, we may in the future continue to directly procure such data center infrastructure and we may also undertake other efforts to build out our own compute and infrastructure and invest more deeply in the compute supply chain, which could result in significantly higher upfront costs and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. For more information about such lease arrangements, see the sections titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations” and “—If our actual compute requirements differ materially from our projections, we may fail to secure sufficient compute to meet our needs or we may be committed to excess compute that remains underutilized.” We have limited experience in managing such data center infrastructure projects at scale. Successfully executing on these data center 74
Text is provided for reference. Check the original for tables, images, and exact formatting.