The paper trail

Small print.
Wide open.

A clear path from a claim to the page it came from. Here’s the filing, the research, and how we read it.

The documentS–1Anthropic, PBC26 OCT 2026 · 421 PP.
01The original SEC filingThe authoritative source, in your browser.SEC · HTML 02Download the saved filingThe complete 421-page document, optimized for downloading.PDF · 46 MB 03Download the full researchFindings, customer examples, calculations, and source references.Markdown

Page by page

Go straight to the source.

Page references count physical pages in the saved PDF, starting at 1. The printed filing number is shown separately when available.

Enter a page from 1 to 421. No PDF download needed.

From the filing

PDF page 216

Printed filing page 205 · Extracted page text

View on the SEC
Read the page text
Table of Contents

become  available,  expanding  our  access  to  compute  capacity  while  reducing  our  dependence  on  any 
single hardware provider.

See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
—Liquidity  and  Capital  Resources—Contractual  Obligations—Infrastructure  Service  Arrangements”  for  more 
information regarding the terms of these arrangements.

Our Data Center Strategy

Historically,  we  purchased  compute  under  fixed-time  agreements.  As  our  compute  requirements  have  scaled, 
we have transitioned to a hybrid model in which, in addition to purchasing compute as a cloud service, we also 
procure specialized AI accelerators directly and operate this hardware in dedicated data center facilities leased 
and  operated  on  our  behalf,  to  our  specification.  We  refer  to  this  additional  source  of  compute  as  Anthropic 
Direct. This transition is driven in part by the scale of our compute requirements as well as the potential long-
term  economic  advantages  of  direct  infrastructure  leasing  and  hosting. Our  first  data  center  facility  became 
operational this year. 

Anthropic Direct also lets us separate our commitment to data center capacity from our commitment to the AI 
accelerators deployed inside it. Because data centers require longer lead times but represent a smaller fraction 
of  total  compute  costs,  this  approach  enables  us  to  secure  data  center  capacity  early  while  deferring  larger 
accelerator investments until our specific compute needs are more certain.

Our data center infrastructure strategy includes several contractual arrangements that, taken together, form a 
new source of compute to supplement the capacity we procure from our CSPs. Such arrangements include the 
following:

•

•

•

Compute 
Infrastructure  Equipment. We  procure  specialized  AI  accelerators  and  associated 
components,  including  CPUs  and  high-bandwidth  memory,  through  master  equipment  leases, 
including the 2026 Lease Arrangement, pursuant to which we receive such hardware for deployment in 
dedicated data center facilities operated by others on our behalf. See the section titled “Management’s 
Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations—Liquidity  and  Capital 
Resources—Contractual  Obligations—Infrastructure  Equipment  Leases” 
information 
regarding the terms of these leases.

for  more 

Data Centers. In certain of our data center infrastructure arrangements, third-party partners procure 
the underlying real estate, power, and data center facilities, while we lease capacity in those facilities 
and contract with specialized third-party operators for ongoing facility management. For example, we 
have entered into a colocation and services agreement with Fluidstack USA I Inc. (“Fluidstack”), under 
which  Fluidstack  provides  data  center  development  and  operations  services  to  us.  We  have  also 
executed data center leases directly and expect to do so increasingly over time. To secure certain data 
center development projects, which require significant capital commitments in advance of deployment, 
we have in some cases relied, and expect to continue to rely, on arrangements with financing sources or 
partners who guarantee the lease obligations to support the development of data center capacity that is 
expected to host such partner’s chips or computing infrastructure. Our ability to expand compute and 
infrastructure  capacity  through  these  arrangements  in  the  future  may  depend  on  the  continued 
willingness and ability of a limited number of CSPs, partners, and financing sources to enter into and 
perform under them.

Electrical Power. Electrical power procurement requires separate arrangements with utility providers 
or, in some cases, development of behind-the-meter power generation capacity that supplies electricity 
directly to the facility rather than through the broader electric grid. Securing adequate power capacity 
for data center projects, whether through grid-connected or behind-the-meter arrangements, typically 
requires  long  lead  times  and  significant  financial  commitments  well  in  advance  of  when  facilities 
become operational.

Our data center infrastructure projects are currently located primarily in the United States. As we continue to 
expand  our  global  customer  base  and  research  operations,  we  are  pursuing  additional  data  center  capacity 
internationally to support our full range of workloads. 

205

Text is provided for reference. Check the original for tables, images, and exact formatting.

Find a section 16 starting points

Section links may begin before the exact paragraph cited in a finding. PDF numbers below use physical pages.

  1. Founders’ letterp. 3SEC
  2. Defined termsp. 12SEC
  3. Prospectus summaryp. 16SEC
  4. Risk factorsp. 38SEC
  5. Management’s discussion & analysisp. 144SEC
  6. Businessp. 190SEC
  7. Governancep. 254SEC
  8. Executive compensationp. 275SEC
  9. Related-person transactionsp. 293SEC
  10. Principal & selling stockholdersp. 299SEC
  11. Capital-stock rightsp. 303SEC
  12. Shares eligible for future salep. 318SEC
  13. Underwritingp. 327SEC
  14. Auditor change & expertsp. 345SEC
  15. Financial statements & notesp. 347SEC
  16. Part II & exhibit indexp. 413SEC

How this was made

Read in full.
Kept in context.

A snapshot of the filing dated , rather than a live record of later events.

3primary reviewers
421pages reviewed
43image instances checked

The review

Three primary reviewers read non-overlapping ranges of the complete main filing. All 43 embedded image instances were transcribed and visually reviewed, including the founders’ letter, charts, and customer case studies. Financial tables were also checked visually for dates, units, and column alignment.

A separate reviewer checked the draft’s calculations, accounting interpretations, and customer qualifications. An additional check covered the later merged findings. The result is 62 findings and 21 customer examples.

The boundary

Companion contracts and other exhibits named in the filing’s index are separate documents and were not independently reviewed. Customer outcomes, technical benchmarks, forecasts, and scientific priority claims remain attributed company or customer disclosures.

The numbers

Dollar figures are U.S. dollars. H1 means the six months ended June 30; Q2 means the three months ended June 30. The 2026 interim financial statements are unaudited. Our calculations show their inputs and are labeled separately from reported values.

Blank fields stay undisclosed. Figures with different periods, conditions, or potentially overlapping scopes are kept separate. An earlier tender price is not an IPO price.

What the evidence labels mean
Reported in filing
A company disclosure, with the period and accounting basis retained.
Company estimate / company claim
An estimate or assertion attributed to the company, with its uncertainty preserved.
Our calculation
A derived figure using cited inputs. It is not a separately reported company metric.
Customer example
A selected case study, with its measurement limits. It is not representative ROI.
Proposed / conditional
A status qualifier for an arrangement that is not yet effective or depends on stated conditions.

About updates. This edition is tied to the October 26, 2026 filing. Any later revision should identify its new source date and preserve the basis of earlier claims.

The footnotes are only the beginning.Explore the findings Read the story
The original, in context

Open the footnote.

A closer look at the filing

Anthropic · Form S-1PDF 1

Opening page 1…

Filed October 26, 2026. PDF is approximately 46 MB and opens only when requested. Section links may precede the exact cited paragraph.