The paper trail

Small print.
Wide open.

A clear path from a claim to the page it came from. Here’s the filing, the research, and how we read it.

The documentS–1Anthropic, PBC26 OCT 2026 · 421 PP.
01The original SEC filingThe authoritative source, in your browser.SEC · HTML 02Download the saved filingThe complete 421-page document, optimized for downloading.PDF · 46 MB 03Download the full researchFindings, customer examples, calculations, and source references.Markdown

Page by page

Go straight to the source.

Page references count physical pages in the saved PDF, starting at 1. The printed filing number is shown separately when available.

Enter a page from 1 to 421. No PDF download needed.

From the filing

PDF page 256

Printed filing page 245 · Extracted page text

View on the SEC
Read the page text
Table of Contents

Changes to the LTBT and Class T Common Stock

The terms of the LTBT and the rights of our Class T common stock may be amended as follows (any of which, 
the “Trust Amendment Threshold”):  

•

•

if  the  Trustees  are  voting  in  favor  of  such  amendments,  upon  approval  of  80%  of  the  authorized 
members of our board of directors and 80% of the Trustees then in office (in each case, rounded up or 
down to the nearest whole number (any exact 0.5 rounding up));

if  our  Class  F  common  stock  remains  outstanding  and  the  Trustees  are  not  voting  in  favor  of  such 
amendments:

◦

◦

until  the  third  anniversary  of  the  completion  of  this  offering,  upon  approval  by  (i)  our  Class  F 
common  stock  acting  pursuant  to  the  unanimous  approval  of  the  Continuing  Founders,  (ii)  a 
majority  of  the  votes  cast  by  our  Class  E  common  stock  (subject  to  a  quorum  of  40%  of  the 
outstanding Class E common stock), and (iii) a majority of the votes cast by our outstanding Class 
A common stock (subject to a quorum of a majority of outstanding Class A common stock); or

at any time, upon approval by (i) our Class F common stock acting by decision of 66 2/3% of the 
Continuing Founders (rounded up to the nearest whole number), (ii) 75% of the votes cast by our 
Class E common stock (subject to a quorum of a majority of outstanding Class E common stock), 
and  (iii)  a  majority  of  the  votes  cast  by  our  Class  A  common  stock  (subject  to  a  quorum  of  a 
majority of outstanding Class A common stock); or

•

if  no  Class  F  common  stock  remains  outstanding  and  the  Trustees  are  not  voting  in  favor  of  such 
amendments, upon approval of 85% of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock. 

In addition, our Class T common stock may be redeemed by us for no consideration upon approval of persons 
comprising the above thresholds for amendments of the terms of the LTBT or the rights of our Class T common 
stock.

Trustees of the LTBT

The LTBT is governed by five Trustees. The Trustees have the authority to appoint the Trustees by majority vote 
of  the  Trustees  then  in  office  and  to  remove  the  Trustees  by  majority  vote  of  the  total  number  of  authorized 
Trustees  or  by  the  unanimous  approval  of  the  other  Trustees  then  in  office  and  the  approval  of  the  NGC, 
provided that the LTBT must provide at least 30 days’ prior written notice to our NGC before effecting any such 
appointment  or  removal.  The  notice  period  is  waivable  by  our  NGC  in  its  discretion.  Trustees  may  also  be 
removed by order of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware upon petition by a person designated by the 
Trust  Agreement  as  having  the  power  to  enforce  the  agreement  if  a  Trustee  has  engaged  in  disqualifying 
conduct and removal would best serve the purpose of the LTBT. Trustees will serve annual terms, and there is 
no  limit  to  the  number  of  terms  a  Trustee  may  serve.  Trustees  are  selected  based  on  their  expertise  in  areas 
relevant  to  the  LTBT’s  purpose,  including  AI  safety,  national  security,  public  policy,  social  enterprise,  and 
related fields. In practice to date, the Trustees and company executives have collaborated closely on sourcing, 
interviewing, and selecting Trustees. Of the five authorized seats for Trustees, one is currently vacant. 

Dr. Neil “Buddy” Shah has served as a Trustee and Chair of the LTBT since June 2023. Dr. Shah will also serve 
as an initial manager of the Anthropic Public Benefit Fund. Dr. Shah has served as Chief Executive Officer of the 
Clinton Health Access Initiative (“CHAI”), a global health organization focused on improving access to health 
services  in  low-  and  middle-income  countries,  since  June  2022.  Prior  to  joining  CHAI,  Dr.  Shah  served  as 
Managing Director of GiveWell, a nonprofit organization focused on directing charitable capital to cost-effective 
global  health  and  development  programs,  and,  before  that,  as  co-founder  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of 
IDinsight,  a  global  advisory,  data  analytics,  and  research  organization.  He  holds  an  A.B.  in  Economics  from 
Harvard University, an M.D. with an emphasis in global health policy from Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 
and an M.P.A. in International Development from Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

Dr. Shah was selected to serve as a Trustee because of his expertise in global health, impact measurement, and 
social enterprise, and his experience evaluating the long-term societal effects of large-scale programs.

245

Text is provided for reference. Check the original for tables, images, and exact formatting.

Find a section 16 starting points

Section links may begin before the exact paragraph cited in a finding. PDF numbers below use physical pages.

  1. Founders’ letterp. 3SEC
  2. Defined termsp. 12SEC
  3. Prospectus summaryp. 16SEC
  4. Risk factorsp. 38SEC
  5. Management’s discussion & analysisp. 144SEC
  6. Businessp. 190SEC
  7. Governancep. 254SEC
  8. Executive compensationp. 275SEC
  9. Related-person transactionsp. 293SEC
  10. Principal & selling stockholdersp. 299SEC
  11. Capital-stock rightsp. 303SEC
  12. Shares eligible for future salep. 318SEC
  13. Underwritingp. 327SEC
  14. Auditor change & expertsp. 345SEC
  15. Financial statements & notesp. 347SEC
  16. Part II & exhibit indexp. 413SEC

How this was made

Read in full.
Kept in context.

A snapshot of the filing dated , rather than a live record of later events.

3primary reviewers
421pages reviewed
43image instances checked

The review

Three primary reviewers read non-overlapping ranges of the complete main filing. All 43 embedded image instances were transcribed and visually reviewed, including the founders’ letter, charts, and customer case studies. Financial tables were also checked visually for dates, units, and column alignment.

A separate reviewer checked the draft’s calculations, accounting interpretations, and customer qualifications. An additional check covered the later merged findings. The result is 62 findings and 21 customer examples.

The boundary

Companion contracts and other exhibits named in the filing’s index are separate documents and were not independently reviewed. Customer outcomes, technical benchmarks, forecasts, and scientific priority claims remain attributed company or customer disclosures.

The numbers

Dollar figures are U.S. dollars. H1 means the six months ended June 30; Q2 means the three months ended June 30. The 2026 interim financial statements are unaudited. Our calculations show their inputs and are labeled separately from reported values.

Blank fields stay undisclosed. Figures with different periods, conditions, or potentially overlapping scopes are kept separate. An earlier tender price is not an IPO price.

What the evidence labels mean
Reported in filing
A company disclosure, with the period and accounting basis retained.
Company estimate / company claim
An estimate or assertion attributed to the company, with its uncertainty preserved.
Our calculation
A derived figure using cited inputs. It is not a separately reported company metric.
Customer example
A selected case study, with its measurement limits. It is not representative ROI.
Proposed / conditional
A status qualifier for an arrangement that is not yet effective or depends on stated conditions.

About updates. This edition is tied to the October 26, 2026 filing. Any later revision should identify its new source date and preserve the basis of earlier claims.

The footnotes are only the beginning.Explore the findings Read the story
The original, in context

Open the footnote.

A closer look at the filing

Anthropic · Form S-1PDF 1

Opening page 1…

Filed October 26, 2026. PDF is approximately 46 MB and opens only when requested. Section links may precede the exact cited paragraph.